on Facebook
RSSChats & Other Live Events
Transcript: Q&A with Bruce Pascoe on UA basketball
Here's the transcript of today's live Q&A chat with the Star's basketball beat writer, Bruce Pascoe.
-
Welcome to today's live chat on UA basketball. Bruce Pascoe will begun answering your questions at noon. If you've already submitted a question, you don't have to submit it again - the questions don't become visible until Bruce is ready to answer them. -

-

-

-

-
I think York's minutes may be limited to when there is foul trouble or injuries to the backcourt, or against teams where UA is winning comfortably with four minutes or less remaining. He is a well-regarded player -- and definitely a good offensive talent who is improving defensively -- but there is too big a gap between him and the three guards ahead of him. -
Seems like Tarczewski is a big tough kid who can change the game inside the paint defensively. Does he have a go to move offensively. Seems to score more when cleaning up the boards but when the ball is forced down to him he has issues catching the ball. Still really glad he's a Wildcat. -

-

-
I think 15-3 is a good guess but i'll be conservative and say 14-4 because (and not to jinx anybody) but this team has been unusually free of injuries, foul trouble and other issues and that often doesn't last an entire season (though it did in 2008-09). This team should have a good chance to run the table at home but all road games (especially OSU, Oregon, UCLA and Colorado) may be dangerous. -

-
Yeah maybe. But 1-4 will work just about the same. the real key is that UA wins the Pac-12 and gets the top western seed. then the path to the Final Four goes through either Salt Lake or San Jose for the first weekend, and LA for the second -- all in Pac-12 country. That can make a big difference getting to the final four. -

-

-

-

-

-
Great question. This is a team that will be hurt for every individual award because it has so many valuable contributors (witness the fact that it still has not received a Pac-12 Player of the Week award). You could argue either Nick Johnson (most consistent overall, great defense), Solomon Hill (box score filler, leader) or Mark Lyons (clutch player who scores when needed the most) -

-
I still think UCLA is the No. 2 team because of its talent, and the fact that they are getting better quickly after so many chemistry issues earlier in the season. Colorado and Oregon have been probably the next impressive. Stanford and Cal are both good also. Washington is still going to be tough at home but after that it's really a close call with USC being probably the most disappointing team because of its talent. -

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-
That's a good philosophical question. I do think a few more good real minutes would help their confidence and some other coaches may have done that. But Miller's philosophy has always been to really tighten up the rotation by mid-December and play the guys who will help you win. Considering that all games count equally now toward NCAA tournament consideration it's hard to argue that point. In the days when the late season games counted more, maybe you could afford an early loss at the expense of development. -

-

-

-
Well, if you are looking at them doing exactly as they are predicted to for each game it's not. You figure UA may only be an underdog at UCLA at this point. But I still think 3 or 4 losses are very possible. As much as UA likes to play on the road, it's just really, really tough (you may recall that a so-so USC team beat the 1997-98 team in LA even) and this season, as much as ever, teams and their fans are going to be wired for the games when they play UA. -
Bruce, Am I the only one that doesn't see Solo with rose-colored glasses?? He can contribute across all of the stats but as a senior, his offensive game is out of control with his dribbling, crashing into defenders and forcing 3's. I really would like him to spend more time as a 4 and have Parrom continue getting more minutes. Your thoughts?? -
that's a trend to watch. So far though Miller has been very against playing Hill at 4 but you could argue he was more effective there, creating mismatches, etc. Hill has had some decision-making problems and I think if anything its a result of wanting to do too much and forcing the issue. Maybe Hill at 4 and Parrom at 3 is more of a possibility but not if the big guys are effective. He's got 3 future NBA players at 4-5 so it's hard to kick them onto the bench, also. -

Follow the Arizona Daily Star
on Twitter
Follow @starnetGoogle+
on Google+
Get email updates from
RSS
Follow via RSS
Deals, offers & events
View more...Involved in a car accident? Need legal assistance?
Automobile accidents are a common and unfortunate fact of life…
Check out our Native American Art! Stop in to Jay’s of Tucson today!
Kachina’s, Iron Wood Carvings, Nylon Rope Baskets, Tiles to Sm…
Video
Event Calendar
Most viewed:
• Today's events
• Add an event
• Business
• Fund-raisers
• Theater
• Movie times
StarNet newsletters
Sign up for StarNet e-mail newsletters









Please Wait…